Study of Quality of Life in Pangsak in the sustainable Community, Mae Pern District, Nakhon Sawan Province

Abstract

This research aimed to: (1) study the quality of life of people in Pang Sak Community; and (2) examine the strength of the people in Pang Sak Community, including problems and obstacles. This study employed a qualitative research approach using Participatory Action Research (PAR) techniques. The research area was purposively selected. Data were collected from 30 key informants who were purposively selected from qualified persons, experts, and stakeholders. The key informants included community leaders, local scholars, and social organization groups. Data collection methods included interviews, in-depth interviews, participatory meetings, workshops, focus group discussions, and community forums. The research instrument was a structured in-depth interview form. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and analyzed using descriptive analysis.

Research Findings

(1) Quality of Life of the People:
The findings revealed that the quality of life of the people in Pang Sak Community toward sustainability was affected by inequitable distribution of state resources. Government projects, particularly those aimed at addressing quality-of-life problems, did not adequately reach people in rural areas who experienced quality-of-life difficulties. People with quality-of-life problems in rural communities lacked opportunities to access government services, including solutions to problems concerning agricultural land, education, transportation and mobility, lack of knowledge for improving their own quality of life, and public health problems among rural residents. However, these projects did not genuinely reach the intended target population.

(2) Community Strength:
The findings revealed that, in terms of leadership, important roles were played in developing leadership and leaders of various organizations within the community. The community promoted and strengthened diverse forms of transformative leadership. In terms of network building, the community was encouraged to establish strong local networks, with emphasis placed on community participation. The community itself was encouraged to identify and present its own problems and needs. A sense of pride among local people was created by integrating historical stories to bring people together and strengthen community unity. The community also aimed to develop itself as a tourist destination while conserving and developing the community environment for the benefit of the community and the public. In terms of community consciousness, Pang Sak Community demonstrated a consciousness of self-reliance, mutual care and support, and love for the local area and community. It also demonstrated awareness of community development and environmental conservation, while using local customs, traditions, and culture as a model for community development.

(3) Problems and Obstacles:
The findings revealed eight major problems and obstacles to community development that prevented it from achieving sustainability: 1) lack of continuous participation; 2) lack of serious coordination and cooperation; 3) lack of successors to ensure the continuity of activities; 4) insufficient collective consciousness among local residents; 5) lack of knowledge and understanding of the relevant projects or activities; 6) lack of strong leadership or development-oriented ideas; 7) lack of funding for establishing funds or community groups; and 8) lack of honesty and transparency in budget allocation.