Techniques and Values in Reading Political Science Literature for Academic in English
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This academic article focuses on the significance of employing appropriate techniques and values when reading English political science literature in English. The article highlights key techniques, including active reading and annotation, skimming, and scanning for key information, identifying arguments and evidence, analysing text structure, and assessing source credibility. Additionally, it emphasizes values such as critical thinking, interdisciplinary engagement, recognizing bias, and ethical considerations. By integrating these techniques and values, readers can enhance their understanding of political science literature, contribute to research advancements, and foster a more comprehensive and responsible approach to the field. The article encourages further exploration and application of these approaches, highlighting their potential impact on research outcomes and the broader understanding of political science.
Article Details
Section
References
Bevir, M. (2013). The SAGE handbook of governance. Berkeley: University of California.
Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Browne, M. N., Keeley, S. M., & McCall, S. M. (2014). Asking the right questions: A guide
to critical thinking. Boston: Pearson Education.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Paul, Richard; Elder, Linda. (2006). Critical thinking: The nature of critical and creative
thought. Journal of Developmental Education, 30(2), 34-35.
Fisher, A., Scriven, M., & Tocci, G. (1997). Critical thinking: Its definition and assessment.
CA.: EDGE Press.
Heywood, A. (2017). Political theory: An introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Johnson, L., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative,
and mixed approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and
development. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the
social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McMillan, K., & Weyers, J. (2018). Reading and studying political science. New York:
Routledge.
Munck, G. L., & Snyder, R. (Eds.). (2007). Passion, craft, and method in comparative
politics. Baltimore: JHU Press.
Ritchie, D. A. (2016). Reading political philosophy: From Machiavelli to Mill. London:
Polity Press.
Roberts, J. M. (2018). The history of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sire, J. W. (2015). The universe next door: A basic worldview catalog. Illinois: InterVarsity
Press.
Thammongkol, Kanda. (1998). Learning to Read and Reading to Learn. Bangkok: Amarin
Book Center Company Limited.